Sadly, a wrench was thrown into our vacation plans to visit Montreal, but my brother’s move to Indiana and our time spent at both Richmond and the Cedar Point Amusement Park were all quite successful. In addition, I was able to see one of my best friends, thompdjames of The Dusty Thanes, for a few hours in Indiana. The joy of meeting him after a little over three years is worth a thousand Montreals.
But, Richmond produced my most interesting meeting of the trip. This particular old gentleman was most voluble touching his life spent in the South. One story he told concerning one near and dear to him, however, shocked and infuriated me. Six abandoned and wicked men committed an unspeakable crime against a man and his fiancee–let it suffice to say that this crime would not be out of place in the pages of Akame ga Kiru. One might read of such a crime in the papers, but one never expects to meet someone of such close propinquity to it.
For the most part, crimes of shocking villainy seem far removed from us. Even more unreal is the experience that some people would find inflicting traumatic mental and physical pain on others great fun. Akame ga Kiru has many people just like that; but, there’s no way we would actually meet such villains as those in our lives, right? We live in states far from the southern border, out of the traditionally violent South, and separate from crime-ridden major cities. There’s no chance of extreme violence happening to us in civilized societies!
Yet, why not? What prevents us from becoming victims besides the Providence of God? And we know that evil things happen to people despite their decency, virtue, and innocence. The case is, as Akame ga Kiru shows, that people are targeted by the predatory elements of society merely because their intended victims seem weak. Episode one featured a family who targeted hapless people from the countryside. In the world of Akame ga Kiru just being weak ensures that one will meet a gruesome end.
In modern society, there similarly stands no guarantee of us escaping a confrontation with violent men during our lifetime. People take steps to eliminate or compensate for their weaknesses. In forty of the U. S. states, people often carry firearms concealed or openly, practice using them, and take classes on the legal ramifications of self-defense with a firearm. Where firearms are not permitted either to be owned or carried about the person, people take up the study of martial arts. (Great Britain was the best example to come to mind.) Stringent gun laws give the citizens of most major cities no other option, unless they’re the sort to rely solely on the police for protection. Yet, a famous court case did rule that the police have no responsibility to protect individual citizens–just to maintain public order. Translation: If they can help you, they will. But, if they can’t and you get murdered, robbed, etc., the police are not liable. Do you really want to count on the police now?
It is a shame, however, that stringent anti-gun policies, inadequate anti-crime policies, and other factors make for dangerous inner city environments. That city dwellers cannot use firearms as a means of self-defense and need to take up martial arts reminds one of feudal Japan or medieval Europe, where the constant threat of violence in their societies also required them to study the art of combat. One cannot help but wonder that the people who would benefit most from concealed carry are usually denied it!
To conclude, the threat of violence posed by nefarious individuals in society is not as remote as one might think. This practically makes learning how to defend oneself a duty, despite a loss of leisure. Of course, one can also take no precaution and live in the hope of never being targeted. Crime in the U.S. is on a steady decline after all; but, the best policy is always to be prepared.
I hope that you enjoyed this ramble!